The European Union’s decision to propose tariffs on only 37% of Israeli imports is a deliberately calibrated strike, not an all-out economic war. This targeted approach reveals a complex strategy aimed at maximizing political pressure while minimizing unintended economic consequences and maintaining the possibility of a future reconciliation.
By leaving 63% of the €15.9 billion trade relationship untouched, the EU is sending a clear message: this is a warning shot, not a fatal blow. It demonstrates that the bloc has the power to inflict much greater economic pain if it chooses to, holding the threat of further escalation in reserve.
This calibrated approach also makes the proposal more politically viable within the EU. A full trade suspension would likely be too radical for many member states and could cause significant disruption to European businesses that rely on Israeli imports. A partial measure is an easier sell, presenting a compromise between radical action and complete inaction.
Furthermore, it allows the EU to maintain some leverage. If the situation deteriorates further, the EU can threaten to expand the tariffs to a larger percentage of goods. If the situation improves, it can offer to lift the existing tariffs as a reward. This gives the EU a flexible tool for ongoing diplomacy.
Finally, the selective nature of the tariffs, which notably excludes arms exports, protects the EU’s own strategic interests. It is a pragmatic calculation designed to ensure that the pressure campaign against Israel does not inadvertently harm the security of the EU’s own member states.
A Calibrated Strike: Why the EU is Targeting Only a Portion of Israeli Trade
3